
This concept note examines how the European Union’s evolving financial architecture has turned funding into a central tool for governing return and readmission beyond its borders. Tracing four phases from the 1990s to the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, it shows how external migration funding grew from fragmented development aid into a consolidated, conditional system centred on instruments such as AMIF, BMVI, trust funds, and especially NDICI–Global Europe. A multi-level analysis of €35.6 billion in migration and border-management spending, including 221 NDICI–GE projects, finds that the bulk of resources prioritises control, containment, and return over protection, legal pathways, and reintegration, often under humanitarian framing. The note argues that this “financialisation” of externalisation embeds EU return and readmission priorities in third countries’ migration infrastructures, while raising serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and the marginalisation of rights-based objectives.
Return migration, Return finance, EU
Return migration, Return finance, EU
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
