Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ACL Reconstruction with ACL and Meniscus Repair, Early and Midterm Outcomes

Authors: International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR);

ACL Reconstruction with ACL and Meniscus Repair, Early and Midterm Outcomes

Abstract

Abstract Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, often associated with meniscal tears, are common in young athletes. Timely surgical intervention is crucial to restore function, reduce pain, and prevent long-term sequelae such as osteoarthritis and persistent knee instability. Objectives: To compare early and midterm clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, functional recovery, and complication rates following isolated ACL reconstruction versus combined ACL and meniscal repair over a follow-up period of up to two years. Methodology: This retrospective study analysed 135 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) at Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee. Patients were categorised into isolated ACL tear and ACL with meniscal tear groups. Outcomes were assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and Tayside patient satisfaction questionnaire at 26, 52, and 104 weeks. Statistical analysis included t-tests and binomial tests. Complication rates were documented. Inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured a homogenous study population without multi-ligament or fracture-related knee injuries. Results: Isolated ACL tears accounted for 40 patients; 95 had combined ACL and meniscal injuries. Most cases occurred in patients under 25 years. Both groups showed significant pain reduction (VAS) and functional improvement (KOOS) at all follow-up points (p<0.001). The ACL-only group demonstrated superior early outcomes in pain, function, and sports participation, whereas by 52–104 weeks, the ACL+ meniscus group achieved better scores in quality of life and sports function. Satisfaction was consistently high in both groups but slightly higher in ACL-only patients at early follow-ups. Complication rates were 13% for ACL-only and 20% for combined repairs, with graft failure most common. Most complications occurred within 26 weeks and were managed conservatively or with minor surgical interventions. Conclusion: Both isolated ACL reconstruction and combined ACL with meniscal repair significantly improve pain, function, and satisfaction. Early recovery is faster in isolated ACL injuries, but combined repairs demonstrate superior long-term quality of life and sports function outcomes.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament, Meniscal tear, KOOS score, VAS pain, Arthroscopic repair

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green