Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Read-Across from D-Allulose Supports an Animal-Free Safety Assessment of 5-Keto-D-Fructose (5-KDF)

Authors: Fooditive Group; Abushokhedim, Moayad;

Read-Across from D-Allulose Supports an Animal-Free Safety Assessment of 5-Keto-D-Fructose (5-KDF)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Modern toxicological science recognizes that structurally similar food ingredients can be assessed through validated alternative methods rather than animal testing. 5-Keto-D-fructose (5-KDF), a rare ketohexose, shares substantial structural similarity with the approved rare sugar D-allulose. Objective: To determine whether 5-KDF and D-allulose exhibit equivalent safety profiles across computational, physicochemical, and experimental endpoints, and whether this structural analogy obviates the need for animal studies. Methods: Structural similarity was quantified using Morgan fingerprints (RDKit v2024.09.6). Computational toxicology employed Derek Nexus v6.1.0, VEGA QSAR, ToxTree v3.1.0, and ProTox-II. Experimental genotoxicity assessment followed OECD TG 471 (bacterial reverse mutation, five strains ±S9) and OECD TG 473 (chromosomal aberration in human lymphocytes ±S9). Mechanistic safety was evaluated in differentiated Caco-2 intestinal and HepG2 hepatic cells with critical osmotic controls (mannitol). Results: Structural analysis demonstrated 60% similarity (Tanimoto coefficient 0.60; Dice 0.75) with equivalent physicochemical properties (cLogP: −3.17 vs −3.38; TPSA: 115 vs 118 Ų). All computational platforms unanimously predicted identical non-mutagenic, non-clastogenic, non-carcinogenic profiles. Experimental validation confirmed: bacterial reverse mutation assay negative across all five strains ±S9 (up to 5,000 μg/plate); chromosomal aberration test negative in human lymphocytes ±S9 (up to 1,000 μg/mL). Mechanistic assessment demonstrated statistical equivalence to D-allulose: intestinal barrier integrity preserved (TEER 84±7% vs 86±5%, p=0.58), hepatic ATP maintained (29.8±2.8 vs 30.1±2.5 nmol/mg, p=0.92), no lipogenic gene activation (FASN 0.94±0.15 vs 1.08±0.18-fold, p>0.05), no oxidative stress (109±14% vs 106±12%, p=0.81). Conclusions: 5-KDF exhibits an identical safety profile to approved D-allulose across all measured endpoints. Both compounds are simple monosaccharides lacking structural toxicophores, with equivalent physicochemical properties and metabolic inertness. The comprehensive negative genotoxicity data (Tier 1 battery) combined with structural analogy demonstrates that animal testing (Tier 2) would provide no additional discriminating information. This weight-of-evidence approach satisfies modern safety assessment standards while advancing the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) in toxicological science.

Keywords

5-keto-D-fructose; D-allulose; structural analogy; rare sugars; OECD 471; OECD 473; QSAR; read-across; alternative methods; 3Rs principles

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!