Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Phase-Structured Magnetic Field Assistance for Residual Stress Reduction in Fusion Welding: A Falsifiable, Low-Power Protocol and Measurement Plan

Authors: Lampton, Brian Doyle;

Phase-Structured Magnetic Field Assistance for Residual Stress Reduction in Fusion Welding: A Falsifiable, Low-Power Protocol and Measurement Plan

Abstract

Residual stress and stress gradients generated during fusion welding drive distortion, cracking risk, and fatigue limitations in high-consequence structures (e.g., marine and defense fabrication). This protocol-first paper proposes a conservative, testable hypothesis: a low-power, phase-structured magnetic field applied during weld solidification and the early post-arc cooling interval can reduce peak tensile residual stress and/or stress spatial variance, relative to both a no-field control and a sham-field control with comparable RMS coil power but scrambled phase structure. The mechanism is framed in classical terms (Lorentz-force-driven melt pool convection, stabilization of the solidification front, and reduction of directional bias in flow patterns), not as new physics. The study is designed to be falsifiable with pre-registered thresholds, artifact controls, and heat-input confound checks. Primary measurement is X-ray diffraction residual stress (XRD sin^2 psi), with ASTM E837 hole-drilling as secondary validation and neutron diffraction as an optional premium through-thickness mapping method.Design: Three conditions (Control: coils off; Sham: coils energized with phase scrambling; Active: quadrature currents producing an approximately rotating field vector), pre-registered parameter window (frequency, field strength, post-arc duration, and power ceiling), tiered measurement path (Tier 1 low-access screening through Tier 3 advanced mapping), and explicit rejection criteria including minimum practical effect thresholds and defect trade-off checks (e.g., stress reduction accompanied by increased porosity is rejected). Includes operational logging and electrical/EM safety constraints.

Keywords

welding,residual stress,fusion welding,magnetic field assistance,phase structured field,quadrature modulation,rotating magnetic field,low power protocol,falsifiable protocol,sham control,control condition,preregistration,heat input control,solidification,post arc cooling,melt pool convection,Lorentz force,solidification front stabilization,stress variance,peak tensile stress, XRD residual stress,sin2psi,hole drilling,ASTM E837,neutron diffraction,through thickness stress mapping,heat affected zone,HAZ,curie temperature,ferromagnetic steel,304 stainless steel,paramagnetic alloy,aluminum alloy,electromagnetic stirring,arc stability,porosity tradeoff,hardness traverse,grain size,ASTM E112,distortion measurement, TIG welding,MIG welding,Helmholtz coils,coil standoff,Hall probe,field strength 10 to 50 mT,frequency 1 to 10 Hz,post arc duration 10 to 60 s,power ceiling 50 W,replication,measurement plan,industrial fabrication,naval fabrication,shipbuilding,pressure vessels,aerospace structures,stress gradient,experimental design,artifact controls,safety and grounding

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green