Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Resolving the H0 and S8 Cosmological Tensions through the Particle Matter Vorticity Model (VPM) and Validation with NANOGrav.

Authors: Vallejos, Omar Ariel;

Resolving the H0 and S8 Cosmological Tensions through the Particle Matter Vorticity Model (VPM) and Validation with NANOGrav.

Abstract

This preprint annex (V) presents the Particle Matter Vorticity Model (VPM) as a unified solution to the H0 and S8 cosmological tensions. By analyzing 1701 Pantheon+ supernovae with a critical mass filter Mc = (1.68 ± 0.22) × 10^12M⊙, we demonstrate that axionic vorticity reduces the H0 tension from 4.56σ to 0.42σ (91% reduction in statistical significance) and the S8 tension from 2.62σ to 1.40σ (46% reduction). The predicted gravitational wave background ΩVPM GW = (3.15 ± 0.53) × 10^−9 shows 0.9σ compatibility with NANOGrav observations. These results, with a combined significance of 5.7σ, validate the ultralight axion (ma = 1.8×10^−22 eV) as a candidate for diffuse dark matter. The value χ 2 red = 0.300 for filtered supernovae (vs 0.276 for ΛCDM) confirms that the model does not overfit the data.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green