
This paper argues that physical singularities are incompatible with minimal consistency requirements of physical theory, including operational time, unitary quantum evolution, bounded field dynamics, and ultraviolet closure. Singularities are reinterpreted not as physical entities or events, but as diagnostic indicators of theoretical incompleteness. The argument is framework-independent and does not rely on speculative assumptions about Planck-scale physics. Rupture–Containment Cosmology is referenced only as an existence proof that singularity-free completion is achievable, without being required to follow the argument.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
