
Women’s representation in Nigeria’s federal legislature remains persistently low despite the existence of multiple genderequality policies, advocacy initiatives, and institutional commitments. This article assesses the effectiveness of existing policies andstrategies to increase women’s political representation and explores pathways to enhance women’s inclusion in the National Assembly.The study adopts a mixed methods design, drawing on survey data from thirty-five National Assembly staff as well as in-depthinterviews and focus group discussions with institutional actors who routinely engage with legislative and committee processes.Quantitative analysis using Spearman correlation reveals that policy awareness and educational attainment are positively associatedwith perceptions of progress in women’s representation. In contrast, institutional barriers, such as weak enforcement and party-levelgatekeeping, significantly undermine perceived policy effectiveness. Qualitative findings corroborate these results, showing thatgender policies are widely regarded as well-intentioned but poorly implemented, with voluntary party commitments and unenforcedquotas yielding limited outcomes. Mentorship, advocacy, and capacity-building initiatives were identified as more effective but remainfragmented and dependent on external support. Interpreted through Critical Mass and Critical Actors Theory, the findings highlighthow low numerical representation and weak institutional frameworks constrain the emergence of actors capable of driving sustainedchange. The article concludes that enhancing women’s representation in Nigeria’s federal legislature requires enforceable policyframeworks, strengthened party accountability, institutionalised monitoring mechanisms, and sustained support for leadershipdevelopment.
Gender Policy, National Assembly, Political Parties, Critical Actors, Gender Equality and Legislative inclusion.
Gender Policy, National Assembly, Political Parties, Critical Actors, Gender Equality and Legislative inclusion.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
