
This experimental physics paper refutes General Relativity (GR) and Thermodynamics by empirical tests that contradicted its predictions. We demonstrate that GR’s foundational dependency, Maxwell’s Equations, fails in three-dimensional systems where magnetic repulsion is geometrically impossible and we provide empirical evidence that heat is a vectorial attractive force capable of generating negentropy. Our experiments reveal that "Gravity" is the macroscopic manifestation of two distinct attractive forces: (1) 3D Magnetic Alignment, which governs solid bodies and precludes stable repulsion, and (2) Thermal Attraction, demonstrated by the "antigravitational" flow of fluids toward heat sources. We present a new cosmological framework where elliptical orbits are resolved not as a product of curved spacetime, but as the dynamic equilibrium between magnetic alignment (structural lock) and thermal attraction (orbital pull).
Planetary Atmospheres as Gravitational Tests Prediction from Pure Mass-Based Gravity: Atmospheric retention should correlate with surface gravity (g ∝ M/R²) Observation: Planet Mass (% Earth) Surface g (% Earth) Atmosphere (% Earth) Core Temp Mars 10.7% 38% 0.0005% Cold Earth 100% 100% 100% Hot Venus 81.5% 90% 9,000% Hot Conclusion: Mass-based gravity alone cannot explain 21,000x atmospheric deficit on Mars or 100x atmospheric surplus on Venus. Core temperature correlates perfectly. Implication: Thermal component to gravitational attraction confirmed by planetary atmospheric data.
thermodynamics, special relativity, Gravity, general relativity, Magnetism, fluid dynamics, einstein, gravity
thermodynamics, special relativity, Gravity, general relativity, Magnetism, fluid dynamics, einstein, gravity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
