
Narrative conflict has traditionally depended on the presence of a clear antagonist—an identifiable character whose opposition shapes plot, morality, and resolution. From classical tragedy to nineteenth-century fiction, antagonists provided moral clarity by concentrating responsibility for harm in a single figure. However, modern and contemporary literary fiction increasingly departs from this model. Many texts no longer present villains who can be named or defeated. Instead, antagonism is relocated to systems, institutions, social norms, and technological structures. This paper argues that antagonists have not disappeared from literary fiction but have undergone a structural transformation. Through readings of works by Shakespeare, Hardy, Kafka, Ishiguro, Eggers, and Aravind Adiga, the paper shows that the “vanishing antagonist” reflects changing experiences of power and responsibility in modern life.
antagonist, narrative conflict, systems, power, modern fiction.
antagonist, narrative conflict, systems, power, modern fiction.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
