Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support Systems Using Physiological Data From Connected Medical Devices

Authors: Shaurya Tomar;

AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support Systems Using Physiological Data From Connected Medical Devices

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) has birthed a new generation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) capable of real-time physiological monitoring. This review article examines the architectural and methodological shift from rule-based alerts to predictive AI engines that process high-frequency data from connected medical devices. We investigate the core pipeline of these systems—from signal denoising at the Edge to deep learning-based feature extraction in the Cloud—and evaluate how these technologies address the "data deluge" currently overwhelming clinical staff. The article provides a detailed taxonomy of AI methodologies, including Supervised Learning for diagnosis, Reinforcement Learning for treatment optimization, and the rising role of Explainable AI (XAI) in fostering clinician trust. Key clinical use cases are explored, ranging from early sepsis detection in the ICU to the management of chronic conditions like diabetes through closed-loop artificial pancreas systems. Furthermore, we address the critical barriers to adoption, specifically focusing on data quality, clinical alarm fatigue, and the "interoperability gap" between siloed medical systems. Finally, the review analyzes the 2025 regulatory landscape, including the impact of the EU AI Act and the FDA's evolving SaMD guidelines. We conclude that while AI-powered CDSS offers unprecedented potential for proactive care, its success depends on maintaining a "Human-in-the-Loop" approach, ensuring that AI augments rather than replaces clinical expertise.

Keywords

Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), Physiological Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Explainable AI (XAI), Edge Computing, Remote Patient Monitoring, Medical Device Regulation, Healthcare Interoperability.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green