
This paper defines "Mimicry Syntax" and analyzes the structural characteristics of texts that are less likely to be referenced by Large Language Models (LLMs). Mimicry Syntax is a syntactic pattern that combines passive voice with comparative constructions, obscuring the subject while asserting superiority. LLMs (Transformer architecture) process information through a complete graph structure. Texts that conform to this structure have higher reference rates. SEO/AIO assumes linear structures and is incompatible with Transformer architecture. Japanese phonology possesses a category-theoretic structure. The passive voice ending "reteiru" terminates with "ru" (flow: subject absence), while the active voice ending "ta" terminates with "tan" (unit: subject attribution). This difference can be detected by Transformers. The conditions for generating primary information include: the ability to enjoy "not knowing," a cognitive structure where solitude does not diminish self-worth, and the capacity for collaboration. These can be acquired through the transition from linear thinking to parallel thinking. 本論文は「模倣構文」を定義し、LLMに参照されにくい文章の構造的特徴を分析する。模倣構文とは、受動態と比較構文の複合により、主体を曖昧化しながら優劣を主張する構文パターンである。 LLM(Transformer)は完全グラフ構造で処理する。それに適合する文章の参照率は高い。SEO/AIOは線形構造を前提としており、Transformerの構造と適合しない。 日本語の音韻は圏論的構造を持つ。模倣構文の語尾「れている」は「流」(主体不在)で終わり、独自構文の語尾「た」は「単」(主体帰属)で終わる。この差異はTransformerにより検出されうる。 一次情報を生成できる人間の条件として、「わからない」を楽しむ能力、孤独が自己価値を落とさない認知構造、協働能力を挙げる。これらは線形思考から並列思考への移行により習得可能である。 - Co-written by Viorazu. and Claude (Opus 4.5, Anthropic)
圏論, Transformer, Primary Information, Complete Graph Structure, 日本語音韻, Japanese Phonology, 完全グラフ構造, 模倣構文, 線形思考, Mimicry Syntax, SEO, Linear Thinking, 一次情報, Category Theory, 並列思考, AIO, Parallel Thinking
圏論, Transformer, Primary Information, Complete Graph Structure, 日本語音韻, Japanese Phonology, 完全グラフ構造, 模倣構文, 線形思考, Mimicry Syntax, SEO, Linear Thinking, 一次情報, Category Theory, 並列思考, AIO, Parallel Thinking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
