Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Profession Matters: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Libyan Healthcare Providers Regarding GLP-1 RA FDA Safety Warnings

Authors: Eshraq Alsherif; Ahmed Atia; Muhy Aldeen Alhemale; Mohammed Alshiref;

Profession Matters: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Libyan Healthcare Providers Regarding GLP-1 RA FDA Safety Warnings

Abstract

Following crucial FDA safety warnings about intestinal obstruction (2023) and suicidal thoughts (2024) related to GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), this study evaluated Libyan healthcare providers' (HCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in light of these updates. A validated questionnaire was used to perform a cross-sectional study of 232 Libyan HCPs prescribing GLP-1 RAs (Pharmacists and Physicians). Data were collected by in-person administration. The study was conducted using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression. Pharmacists, who were the principal prescribers (62.5%), mostly in community settings (44.2%), displayed understanding of FDA warnings (e.g., 55.3% correctly identified the ileus/suicide combination). However, major knowledge-practice gaps were found: 71.5% of pharmacists advised against fiber intake for ileus treatment, and 68.6% mistakenly characterized type 1 diabetes as an absolute contraindication. Pharmacists reported the greatest impact of warnings on prescription (72.0% strongly agreed), but poor trust in handling side effects (mean=3.28, p=0.002). Low screening adherence was found (10.7% "always" tested). "Lack of time" (58.6%) and "patient demand" (65.5%) were two of the challenges identified. Pharmacists favored FDA quick-reference guides (75.0%). Libyan pharmacists are the main GLP-1 RA prescribers, but critical knowledge-practice disconnects and low confidence exist despite awareness of FDA warnings. Identified barriers necessitate tailored interventions and practical workflow tools to mitigate patient safety risks.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green