
Modern communication networks have been completely transformed by the Internet of Things (IoT), which makes it possible for a wide range of devices to exchange data efficiently. But maintaining the best possible Quality of Service (QoS) in IoT networks—especially in cluster-based architectures—remains a major difficulty. In order to improve QoS metrics in IoT routing, this study presents the Deep Belief Lion Optimization (DBLO) algorithm, a novel combination of the Lion Optimization and Deep Belief Networks (DBN). Modern techniques such as Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Krill Herd Algorithm, and Convolutional Lion Routing Optimization (CLRO), which blends LOA with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), are compared to the DBLO algorithm. Critical QoS metrics, including throughput, energy consumption, routing overhead, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and end-to-end delay, are used to gauge performance. Results from experiments show how effective the DBLO algorithm is at maximizing network performance, cutting down on energy use, and guaranteeing dependable data delivery. The suggested method opens the door for more effective and scalable IoT networks by providing a solid solution for QoS improvement in IoT.
Internet of Things (IoT),Quality of Service (QoS), Deep Belief Lion Optimization (DBLO),Lion Optimization Algorithm (LOA),Deep Belief Networks (DBN),Cluster-Based IoT Network, End-to-End Delay, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR),Routing Overhead, Throughput, Energy Consumption
Internet of Things (IoT),Quality of Service (QoS), Deep Belief Lion Optimization (DBLO),Lion Optimization Algorithm (LOA),Deep Belief Networks (DBN),Cluster-Based IoT Network, End-to-End Delay, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR),Routing Overhead, Throughput, Energy Consumption
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
