Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Advances in Salivary Diagnostics: Emerging Roles of Biosensors, Microfluidics and AI in Oral and Chronic Degenerative Non-Communicable Diseases Detection: A Systematic Review

Authors: International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR);

Advances in Salivary Diagnostics: Emerging Roles of Biosensors, Microfluidics and AI in Oral and Chronic Degenerative Non-Communicable Diseases Detection: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Abstract Background: This review evaluates salivary biomarkers—including proteins, cytokines, microRNAs, DNA, RNA, metabolites, and extracellular vesicles—and their diagnostic potential in detecting diabetes, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune and neurodegenerative disorders, periodontal disease, oral cancer, and dental caries. Thirty-two peer-reviewed studies (2015–2025) were synthesized to assess saliva’s role as a diagnostic fluid. Methods: A structured search across major databases identified 822 studies. After screening 120 full texts, 34 studies met inclusion criteria (English language, peer-reviewed, diagnostic focus, and biomarker evaluation). Keywords included salivary diagnostics, oral disease biomarkers, systemic disease detection, salivaomics and point-of-care testing. Studies were categorized by disease type, biomarker class, analytical method (ELISA, RT-PCR, microfluidics, biosensors, spectroscopy, AI-based tools), and design. Results: Over 80% of included papers were reviews or meta-analyses emphasizing emerging technologies such as biosensors, microfluidics, and AI-enabled diagnostics. Oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders were most studied, with biomarkers like IL-8, IL-6, CD44, Cyfra21-1, and salivary micro RNAs demonstrating strong diagnostic accuracy. Periodontal studies identified cytokines, proteolytic enzymes, and microbial profiles as reliable indicators of inflammation. Salivary biomarkers such as glucose, cortisol, CRP, calprotectin, alpha-synuclein, and oxidative stress markers showed strong associations with systemic diseases, supporting saliva’s noninvasive diagnostic value. Conclusion: Collective evidence supports saliva as a cost-effective, rapid, and patient-friendly diagnostic fluid for early disease detection and monitoring. Standardized collection protocols, large-scale validation, and advanced technologies will be essential for its integration into precision medicine and clinical practice.

Keywords

Salivary diagnostics, salivaomics, microRNA, oral cancer, periodontal disease, systemic disease, biosensors, point-of-care testing, AI diagnostics.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research