
This document presents the Understanding-Aligned Intelligence Framework (UAIF), an architectural proposal and research roadmap for achieving provably safe artificial intelligence through genuine cognitive understanding rather than mere behavioral compliance. UAIF integrates formal verification methods from Martin-Löf Type Theory with constitutional principles derived from international human rights law (UDHR). The framework implements a Proof-Carrying Code (PCC) architecture that separates decidable verification (O(n) time) from undecidable proof generation, explicitly acknowledging that automated proof generation for ethical constraints remains an open Grand Challenge. Key contributions include:- Five-layer architecture (Constitutional Principles → Understanding Engine → Motivational Constraints → Rule Validation Gateway → SI Implementation)- Epistemic Adequacy / Motivational Conformance (EA/MC) split addressing the "psychopath problem"- Proportionality calculus based on Alexy's Weight Formula for rights conflict resolution- Comprehensive threat model covering external attackers through mesa-optimizers- Explicit limitations including Frozen Robot Problem and Reality Gap UAIF is positioned as a rigorous foundation for AI safety research rather than a deployment-ready specification. The framework builds on the Cognitive Understanding Architecture (CUA) and provides a formal basis for future work in provably aligned AI systems. Version 1.0.0 includes 7 architectural diagrams, complete references, and detailed analysis of open research challenges.
safety guarantees, Human Rights, Martin-Löf Type Theory, Type Theory, AGI safety, Proof-Carrying Code, AI alignment, cognitive architecture, AI Safety,, provably safe AI, Formal Verification, Alignment
safety guarantees, Human Rights, Martin-Löf Type Theory, Type Theory, AGI safety, Proof-Carrying Code, AI alignment, cognitive architecture, AI Safety,, provably safe AI, Formal Verification, Alignment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
