
This paper examined the availability and utilisation of instructional materials for the implementation of the Basic Science and Technology (BST) curriculum in upper basic schools across North Central Nigeria. Descriptive survey design was used and sample size of 386 Basic Science and Technology teachers was taken by a multistage sampling of a population of 4026 teachers. Data were collected through a validated questionnaire, Availability and Use of Instructional Materials for Implementation of Basic Science and Technology Curriculum that produced a reliability coefficient of 0.89. Mean and standard deviation were used to analyze the data and the Mann-Whitney U test at a level of 0.05 level of significance. The Findings of the study revealed that some instructional materials such as chalkboards, charts, computers, and basic laboratory equipment were available in most schools, many essential materials were either insufficient or lacking, especially in rural areas. The study also found that the overall level of utilisation of instructional materials was low in both urban and rural schools, with no significant difference between locations in terms of availability and utilisation. The researchers concluded that the inadequate provision and underutilisation of instructional materials hinder effective implementation of the BST curriculum. It was recommended that school administrators should ensure that the allocation of resources is equitable, regular supervision, and professional development to enhance teachers’ competence in using instructional materials effectively.
Instructional materials, Basic Science and Technology, curriculum implementation, utilisation, upper basic schools.
Instructional materials, Basic Science and Technology, curriculum implementation, utilisation, upper basic schools.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
