Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessment of Knowledge of Staff Nurses Regarding Surgical Site Infection Prevention at Ramaiah Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru

Authors: International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR);

Assessment of Knowledge of Staff Nurses Regarding Surgical Site Infection Prevention at Ramaiah Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru

Abstract

Abstract Background: Surgical site infection is one of the common healthcare-associated infections. According to the CDC, in 2015 the number of surgical site infections associated with inpatient surgeries was 110,800. In India. Surgical site infection is estimated to be 3-12% (Kumar A,2017, India). As the staff nurses are part of the health care team, their clinical competency in infection control is vital. Nurses during the transition to practice have a theory-practice gap, which can lead to a reduction in the quality of patient care and a reduction of clinical performance, leading to an increased rate of surgical site infection. The present study aimed to assess the level of knowledge of staff nurses regarding surgical site infection prevention. Methodology: A descriptive research design was selected to assess the knowledge of staff nurses regarding surgical site infection prevention. A non-probability convenience sampling technique was used to select 80 subjects, aged between 20-51 years and above. A structured questionnaire containing demographic variables and items on surgical site infection prevention was administered to assess the participants' knowledge levels. Results: The study findings showed that (54) 67.5% of staff nurses have a moderately adequate level of knowledge, (23) 28.7% have an inadequate level of knowledge, and (3) 3.8% have adequate knowledge on surgical site infection prevention with a mean score of 15.83 ± 3.285. Chi-square test shows that there is no statistical association between demographic variables and nurses' knowledge on surgical site infection prevention. Conclusion and Interpretation: The study concluded that from the study findings, 67.5% of subjects had moderately adequate knowledge with a mean score of 15.83. The result of the study shows that there was no significant association between the knowledge and selected demographic variables like age, gender, marital status, educational qualification, working area, working experience, or any training undergone on infection control. Therefore, a lack of staff nurses' knowledge of surgical site infection prevention may lead to an increase in the surgical infection rate.

Keywords

Knowledge, Surgical site infection.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green