Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Knowledge and Acceptability of Cervical Cancer Screening among Entry Level Female Students of selected University in Ekiti State

Authors: BORODE, Samuel Busuyi; AYUBA, Clement; FARUNA, Shiaka; GWATANA, John Danjuma; ILUGBUSI Ayodeji Akinwale;

Knowledge and Acceptability of Cervical Cancer Screening among Entry Level Female Students of selected University in Ekiti State

Abstract

Abstract This study assessed the knowledge, acceptability, and factors influencing the uptake of cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates of Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology, Ikere Ekiti. Findings revealed that most respondents possessed a moderate to good understanding of cervical cancer and its preventive measures, with digital media emerging as the primary source of information, supplemented by health workers and peers. Awareness of screening methods, preventive strategies, and risk factors was generally high, yet gaps in comprehensive knowledge were evident. The study also demonstrated a positive disposition toward cervical cancer screening, as a majority expressed willingness to undergo screening, advise family members, and recognize the importance of preventive testing even in the absence of symptoms. Despite this, a minority of respondents exhibited apprehension, reflecting the impact of fear, sociocultural beliefs, and misconceptions. Moreover, the uptake of screening was influenced by a multifaceted interplay of economic constraints, knowledge deficits, accessibility of services, personal beliefs, and health system-related factors. The findings highlight the need for targeted health education, youth-friendly service delivery, and strategies to enhance accessibility and affordability, aiming to strengthen preventive behaviors and early detection practices among young female undergraduates. Keywords: Cervical cancer, Screening, Knowledge, Acceptability, Female undergraduates, Health education,

Keywords

Knowledge, Cervical cancer, Screening, Health Education, Female undergraduates

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research