Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Journal . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Journal . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessing the Impact of Climate and Environmental Factors on the Financial Risks of Agricultural Producers: Developing an Adaptation Strategy

Authors: Durmanov, A. S.;

Assessing the Impact of Climate and Environmental Factors on the Financial Risks of Agricultural Producers: Developing an Adaptation Strategy

Abstract

Climate change and environmental degradation are intensifying risks for agriculture, threatening both food security and farm livelihoods. Extreme weather events (droughts, floods, heatwaves) and slow-onset changes (rising temperatures, water scarcity, soil degradation) increasingly lead to crop losses and income volatility for producers. For example, disasters caused $3.8 trillion in crop and livestock losses globally from 1991–2021, about $123 billion per year (≈5% of output), underscoring the financial vulnerability of farmers. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate how climatic and environmental factors affect the financial risks of agricultural producers and to develop a comprehensive adaptation strategy to mitigate these risks. Approach: We employ an interdisciplinary approach combining analysis of climate-agriculture data, case studies, and literature review. Key climate risk indicators (e.g. drought frequency, temperature extremes, rainfall variability) are correlated with agricultural financial outcomes (yield variability, income loss, insurance claims), and current adaptation measures are assessed. Results: The analysis reveals that increasing climate hazards and environmental stresses significantly undermine farm productivity and profitability. Global crop yields are projected to decline ~8% by 2050 due to climate warming (and up to 24% by 2100 under high emissions) even after modest farmer adaptations. We find that climate extremes already quadrupled in frequency since the 1970s, leading to more frequent financial shocks for producers – for instance, more frequent droughts and heatwaves now directly reduce harvests and farm incomes, and 88% of agricultural lenders worldwide report farmers are being negatively affected (higher insurance premiums, rising costs) by climate impacts. Our proposed adaptation strategy – including crop diversification, climate-resilient crop varieties, improved irrigation, insurance schemes, and early warning systems – can substantially reduce these financial risks. Case studies indicate that implementing climate-smart practices can increase farm income by ~20–40% and reduce downside risk by ~6% or more. Significance: The findings demonstrate the urgent need and high payoff of adaptation. Proactive adaptation not only protects farmers’ livelihoods and reduces volatility but also yields co-benefits – for example, every $1 invested in resilience generates over $10 in benefits (avoided losses and economic gains). The study’s recommendations inform policymakers and stakeholders on enhancing agricultural resilience, thereby improving financial stability for producers and contributing to sustainable food systems in the face of climate change. 

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green