Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Modèle Conceptuel pour la Commercialisation de la Recherche Scientifique : Analyse des Déterminants dans le contexte de la R.D. Congo

Authors: Jacques WATEZOLO SIVI; Solange KABONGI ZUULA; Thierry GAFUNDU BYAMUNGU; Bienvenu MUSHAGALUSA CHIKANDA; Richard BULALU; Patricia KABASWANGANI KABASELE; José BOKOTO LOKASO;

Modèle Conceptuel pour la Commercialisation de la Recherche Scientifique : Analyse des Déterminants dans le contexte de la R.D. Congo

Abstract

Résumé Cet article propose une méthodologie exploratoire pour analyser le lien entre la production scientifique et entrepreneuriat. L’approche retenue permet de comprendre la création de valeur issue de l’innovation et d’établir un cadre conceptuel structuré. Le modèle méthodologique se déploie en trois cycles : opportunité, bancabilité et croissance après validation marchande. Ce papier a proposé un outil méthodologique reproductible pour les chercheurs et innovateurs désirant créer des entreprises technologiques viables. L'analyse de la transformation des résultats de la recherche scientifique en technologies commercialisables révèle que le blocage en RDC est un échec systémique. Le Modèle Conceptuel en trois Étapes proposé dans cet article offre une solution méthodologique pour y remédier. En imposant une démarche structurée qui va de l'analyse de la Valeur Client (Cycle 1) à la Validation Marchande (Cycle 3), ce cadre force une convergence nécessaire entre la rationalité scientifique et l'impératif commercial. Mots clés : Entrepreneuriat, Recherche scientifique, Transfert de technologie Summary This article proposes an exploratory methodology to analyze the link between scientific production and entrepreneurship. The chosen approach allows for understanding the value creation arising from innovation and establishing a structured conceptual framework. The methodological model unfolds in three cycles: opportunity, bankability, and post-market-validation growth. This paper proposes a reproducible methodological tool for researchers and innovators wishing to create viable technology companies. The analysis of the transformation of scientific research results into marketable technologies reveals that the bottleneck in the DRC is a systemic failure. The Three-Step Conceptual Model proposed in this article offers a methodological solution to address it. By imposing a structured approach that goes from the analysis of Customer Value (Cycle 1) to Market Validation (Cycle 3), this framework enforces a necessary convergence between scientific rationality and the commercial imperative. Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Scientific Research, Technology Transfer

Keywords

African Scientific Journal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green