Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Structural Theory of Thinking: On the Conditions of Correct and Incorrect Cognition

Authors: Rashidi, Alireza, AliReza;

A Structural Theory of Thinking: On the Conditions of Correct and Incorrect Cognition

Abstract

This theory proposes, for the first time, a theoretical framework that addresses the fundamental problem of incorrect thinking in scientific, philosophical, and humanistic disciplines. It argues that the principal source of cognitive error lies in the failure to recognize the staged development of human thought—a failure that confines the thinker within the immediacy of his own thinking. The theory maintains that correct thinking becomes possible only when the individual acquires the capacity to take reflective distance from his own thinking and to become aware of the manner in which thought operates. This capacity is not merely logical or psychological; rather, it is ontological and epistemological in nature and involves a transformation in the structure of cognition itself. Rather than introducing a new set of prescriptive rules, this framework offers a structural reconfiguration of thinking, enabling the thinker to identify and correct errors arising from cognitive self-enclosure. By clarifying the conditions under which reflective distance from one’s own thinking becomes possible, it provides a universal and applicable model relevant to diverse fields of inquiry. Accordingly, the proposed framework contributes to ongoing debates about rationality, methodology, and human cognition by presenting a unified account of sound thinking grounded in structural cognitive development. Theorist and Originator of the Theory: Dr. Alireza Rashidi

Keywords

Theory of Thinking, Philosophy of Mind, Cognitive Structure, Methodology, Correct Thinking, Epistemology, Human Cognition

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green