Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ToCA-Hawking Unification Letter

Authors: Lehn, Henrik;

ToCA-Hawking Unification Letter

Abstract

Title: Ringdown Overtones as a Candidate Signature for Tension-Mediated Hawking Radiation: A Blind Prediction Validation Description / Abstract: We propose that Hawking radiation and the Theory of Cosmic Architecture (ToCA) are fundamentally unified through the tension minimization principle. By identifying the imaginary action with integrated tension ($S_I = \kappa \int D dt$), we suggest that Hawking radiation acts as the inevitable mechanism for resolving frozen tension gradients in black hole horizons. This paper presents a scaling hypothesis whereby gravitational wave ringdown overtones serve as a proxy for near-horizon tension relaxation. Using a strict calibration set of pre-2024 merger events only (GW150914, GW170814, GW190521), we perform a blind prediction test for the recent high-SNR event GW250114 ($M_f \approx 73 M_\odot$). Key Results: The blind prediction ($D_{floor} = 0.139 \pm 0.017$) is confirmed by observational data proxies ($D_{obs} = 0.210 \pm 0.050$) within 1.35σ. This successful blind test supports the hypothesis that ringdown residuals encode the Hawking temperature scaling ($T_H \propto M^{-1}$). Pre-Registration: To ensure methodological rigor and falsifiability, this document formally locks predictions for future LIGO O4 events based on the un-updated pre-2024 model. These predictions serve as a pre-registered hypothesis test for the ongoing observing run.

Keywords

Black Hole Mergers, Hawking Radiation, Gravitational Waves, LIGO, Ringdown, ToCA, Quantum Gravity, Complex Action Theory, Blind Prediction.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!