Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparative Clinical Review of Minimally Invasive vs Conventional Restorative Dentistry in Caries Management

Authors: International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR);

Comparative Clinical Review of Minimally Invasive vs Conventional Restorative Dentistry in Caries Management

Abstract

Abstract Background: The philosophy of restorative dentistry has undergone a profound transformation, moving away from the historically dominant, surgically-oriented principles of G.V. Black. The traditional "extension for prevention" approach, which advocated for the prophylactic removal of sound tooth structure to prevent future caries, is now being superseded by a biologically conservative paradigm. Minimally Invasive Dentistry (MID) prioritises the preservation of healthy tooth tissue, promotes the natural remineralisation of early lesions, and aims to maintain pulp vitality throughout the caries management process. Objective: This review seeks to critically compare the clinical efficacy (including restoration longevity and pulpal health), biological outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and patient-centred experiences of minimally invasive restorative techniques against those of conventional restorative methods for the management of dental caries. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using major electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar) for relevant clinical trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2024. The search focused on studies providing direct comparisons between MID and conventional approaches. Results: Evidence consistently demonstrates that MID techniques—such as Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), selective and stepwise caries removal, and the use of advanced adhesive and bioactive materials—achieve clinical outcomes that are comparable to, and in many aspects superior to, conventional methods. Specifically, MID shows advantages in preserving sound tooth structure, reducing the risk of pulpal exposure and postoperative sensitivity, and enhancing patient comfort and acceptance. While conventional methods remain reliable for extensive, non-restorable cavities, they are associated with greater iatrogenic damage to the tooth and a higher long-term risk of complications like fracture. Conclusion: Minimally invasive restorative dentistry offers a scientifically sound, sustainable, and patient-friendly framework for managing dental caries. Its principles align seamlessly with modern preventive dentistry and are particularly well-suited to address public health challenges, both in India and across the globe.

Keywords

Minimally invasive dentistry, Atraumatic restorative treatment, Caries management, Adhesive restorations, Selective caries removal, Stepwise excavation, Bioactive materials, public health dentistry.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green