Table 2. Comparison between the different Angolan Hemidactylus (excluding H. mabouia and including H. gramineus from DRC). Measurements are represented in mm (average and standard deviation), based on newly collected material for this work with exception of H. nzingae, H. gramineus and H. paivae, where morphological measurements were compiled from information available in Ceríaco et al. (2020a, 2021) and information collected for this work. For abbreviations see Material and Methods section. SpeciesH. faustus sp. nov.H. pfindaensis sp. nov.H. carivoensis sp. nov.H. benguellensisH. cinganji sp. nov.H. longicephalus LINEAGE 1H. longicephalus LINEAGE 2H. paivaeH. bayoniiH. vernayiH. gramineusH. nzingaeSpecimensn=10n=4n=9n=12n=2n=6n=9n=18n=6n=25n=2n=12SVL39.38 ± 3.3545.54 ± 3.1238,18 ± 5,1649.66 ± 8.1248.72 ± 5.1946.21 ± 8.7647.30 ± 3.0957.31 ± 2.1936.29 ± 3.4632.52 ± 4.0736.65 ± 4.0344.28 ± 3.88TL-32.9336,8 ± 7,6440.23 ± 8.6542.77 ± 044.20 ± 6.9448.52 ± 1.9463.05 ± 7.1430.06 ± 11.1125.92 ± 4.1934.40 ± 0.9940.33 ± 3.48TRL16.83 ± 2.5117.85 ± 3.7615,82 ± 1,9221.94 ± 5.9321.33 ± 4.1319.25 ± 4.2918.98 ± 0.0921.45 ± 2.8915.02 ± 2.6213.95 ± 1.8815.85 ± 2.3319.41 ± 2.58BW7.44 ± 0.937.43 ± 0.416,99 ± 1,9210.056 ± 1.8310.14 ± 0.508.28 ± 3.268.5 ± 0.819.81 ± 0.476.69 ± 0.786.12 ± 1.265 ± 0.147.27 ± 1.29FL9.10 ± 1.366.99 ± 1.355,79 ± 0,987.32 ± 1.817.86 ± 1.306.24 ± 1.538.57 ± 0.127.12 ± 1.145.57 ± 0.815.89 ± 1.234.70 ± 0.286.06 ± 0.77CL6.32 ± 0.548.03 ± 1.736,75 ± 1,187.74 ± 1.478.39 ± 1.987.11 ± 0.765.47 ± 0.927.21 ± 1.476.30 ± 0.634.90 ± 1.185.55 ± 0.217.03 ± 0.68HL11.62 ± 1.0913.19 ± 1.4011,10 ± 0,6914.25 ± 2.8612.99 ± 2.6213.12 ± 2.0914.02 ± 0.6614.55 ± 0.5910.13 ± 1.499.59 ± 0.7910.5 ± 0.7112.18 ± 0.27HW8.22 ± 0.798.65 ± 0.856,81 ± 1,109.72 ± 1.739.57 ± 0.848.60 ± 1.559.38 ± 0.5210.02 ± 0.626.75 ± 0.566.01 ± 0.986.35 ± 0.498.11 ± 0.57HH4.95 ± 0.715.26 ± 0.284,21 ± 0,695.52 ± 0.976.32 ± 0.584.93 ± 0.995.65 ± 0.276.12 ± 0.284.37 ± 0.494.04 ± 0.524.25 ± 0.495.08 ± 0.55OD2.87 ± 0.292.81 ± 0.182,68 ± 0,362.97 ± 0.393.14 ± 0.132.97 ± 0.483.02 ± 0.113.21 ± 0.182.42 ± 0.142.25 ± 0.292.10 ± 0.422.81 ± 0.34NE3.39 ± 0.493.81 ± 0.473,38 ± 0,514.52 ± 0.784.18 ± 0.204.13 ± 0.644.45 ± 0.364.54 ± 0.572.88 ± 0.672.68 ± 0.352.95 ± 0.354.26 ± 0.68SE4.6325 ± 0.315.32 ± 0.214,46 ± 0,706.03 ± 1.135.38 ± 0.615.29 ± 0.796.09 ± 0.855.80 ± 0.514.02 ± 0.713.58 ± 0.454.25 ± 0.075.21 ± 0.34EE3.29 ± 0.363.53 ± 0.212,91 ± 0,393.89 ± 0.683.85 ± 0.483.21 ± 0.633.66 ± 0.463.83 ± 0.272.9 ± 0.462.75 ± 0.392.75 ± 0.213.56 ± 0.23EH0.99 ± 0.150.84 ± 0.251,73 ± 2,671.25 ± 0.551.17 ± 0.420.92 ± 0.250.98 ± 0.090.95 ± 0.370.69 ± 0.190.57 ± 0.120.7 ± 0.01.07 ± 0.17IN1.56 ± 0.241.36 ± 0.051,21 ± 0,203.75 ± 6.351.42 ± 0.121.41 ± 0.211.59 ± 0.151.63 ± 0.181.27 ± 0.121.22 ± 0.18--OI3.97 ± 0.403.9 ± 1.413,51 ± 0,614.20 ± 0.664.81 ± 0.043.47 ± 0.724.68 ± 0.174.85 ± 0.043.3 ± 0.352.98 ± 0.49--Precloacal-Femoral Pores17-19815-2223-3326-285-1166-84-94-687-8Post-cloacal (tail) spurs1/11/11/11-4/1-41-2/1-20-1/0-11-1/1-1-1/11-2/1-2--Scales across belly29-3228-3032-3833-4130-3228-3728-3628-3425-3232-3923-2522-27Dorsal tubercles row15-1711-1212-1813-181513-1713-1613-1615-1611-1612-1416-21Supralabials (right/left)9/910/1011/10-1110-11/10-119/910-1210-1210-12/10-128-9/9-109-10/9-1010/9-010-11/10-11Infralabials (right/left)8/88-10/9-109/9-109-10/8-107-9/89-109-109-10/8-107-9/7-87-8/7-88-9/8-98-9/8-9Subcaudals sizeSmall (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small-MediumSmall (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)Small (<1⁄4 tail width)# Granular scales between tubercles2-34-52-32-52-33-63-43-92-42-42-32-3Lamellae 1st finger5-66-5565-65-665-85-65-655-7Lamellae 4th finger776-76-877-87-88-97776-8Lamellae 1st toe5-65-655-765-75-66-765-655-7Lamellae 4th toe9-87-898-988-108-199-118-107-879

Published as part of Lobon-Rovira, Javier, Conradie, Werner, Iglesias, David Buckley, Ernst, Raffael, Verissimo, Luis, Baptista, Ninda & Pinto, Pedro Vaz, 2021, Between sand, rocks and branches: an integrative taxonomic revision of Angolan Hemidactylus Goldfuss, 1820, with description of four new species, pp. 465 in Vertebrate Zoology 71 on page 465, DOI: 10.3897/vz.71.e64781