
【要旨(日本語)】 本稿は、生成AI時代における表現の自由と安全を両立させるための「場の設計」に基づく多層モデルを提案する。公開圏(入口)における年齢ゲート・コンテンツ警告・出自証明などのガードレールを強化しつつ、制作圏(内部)では文脈(教育・研究・創作)に応じた自由度を段階的に拡張するという二重構造の妥当性を示す。さらに、虚構/現実の二分を導入し、教育・研究・創作の現場で運用可能な5層モデルを提示することで、AI依存を超え、人間の主体性を維持する設計思想を論じる。 【Abstract (English)】 This paper proposes a multi-layered model based on "designing spaces" to balance freedom and safety in the age of generative AI. It introduces a dual structure that strengthens guardrails at the public layer while expanding degrees of freedom in the creative layer according to educational and research contexts. By incorporating a fiction/non-fiction bifurcation and presenting a five-layer operational model, the study aims to ensure cultural continuity and human agency beyond automated restrictions.
Designing spaces, Freedom of expression, Fiction/Non-fiction, Generative AI, Educational research, Ethics, Publication pipeline, 場の設計, 表現の自由, 虚構/現実, 生成AI, 教育研究, 倫理, 公開パイプライン
Designing spaces, Freedom of expression, Fiction/Non-fiction, Generative AI, Educational research, Ethics, Publication pipeline, 場の設計, 表現の自由, 虚構/現実, 生成AI, 教育研究, 倫理, 公開パイプライン
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
