
This work presents the Governance & Integrity Model (GIM), a deterministic governance framework for behavioral security systems. GIM defines explicit authority boundaries, integrity invariants, and fail-closed operational semantics designed to ensure institutional trust, traceability, and accountability under failure and adversarial conditions. The model deliberately excludes machine learning and autonomous decision-making from core governance functions, treating them only as external advisory inputs. The paper includes a real-world case study (Melona Sentinel) demonstrating a GIM-compliant behavioral security system operating without ML, DPI, or adaptive autonomy. This record includes:- The main paper (Viewer PDF)- A supplementary note describing figures and page references for clarity without modifying the original document.
non-ML-security,, security-governance,, institutional-security,, integrity, governance,, deterministic-systems,, behavioral-security,, fail-closed-systems,
non-ML-security,, security-governance,, institutional-security,, integrity, governance,, deterministic-systems,, behavioral-security,, fail-closed-systems,
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
