
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming educational landscapes, offering new tools for teaching, learning, and assessment. While its applications in STEM and technical disciplines have been widely studied, AI’s integration into humanistic education including literature, philosophy, and the arts raises distinct pedagogical and ethical questions. Humanistic education emphasizes critical thinking, creativity, moral reasoning, and empathy, qualities that are challenging for AI systems to replicate. This paper examines the intersection of AI and humanistic education, exploring how AI tools can both enhance and complicate traditional pedagogical goals. Key benefits include personalized learning, rapid feedback, accessibility for diverse learners, and support for textual analysis and creative exploration. However, AI also poses challenges, such as intellectual dependency, algorithmic bias, threats to originality, and ethical concerns regarding data privacy and surveillance. By analyzing current applications and case studies in humanities classrooms, this study highlights the tension between technological efficiency and the cultivation of human-centered competencies. The paper argues for a balanced approach in which AI functions as a supportive tool, augmenting rather than replacing humanistic engagement. Ethical frameworks, institutional guidelines, and pedagogical strategies are proposed to ensure that AI contributes to reflective, critical, and empathetic learning. The study underscores that the future of humanistic education depends on integrating technological innovation while preserving the moral, intellectual, and emotional dimensions that define it.
Artificial Intelligence, Humanistic Education, Ethics in Education, Critical Thinking.
Artificial Intelligence, Humanistic Education, Ethics in Education, Critical Thinking.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
