Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Divergent Paths to Modern Governance: A Meta-Analysis of Saudi Arabia's Transformation Journey

Authors: Tessema, Dereje B.; Burrell, Darrell Norman; Al-Hajeri, Mohammed Hamad; Aseffa, Ayenachew; Dereje, Bereketeab;

Divergent Paths to Modern Governance: A Meta-Analysis of Saudi Arabia's Transformation Journey

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's transformation under Vision 2030 represents one of the most ambitious national modernization projects of the twenty-first century, characterized by rapid institutional restructuring, accelerated economic diversification, and a digital-first governance model. This study conducts a meta-analysis of The Kingdom's transformation using the Tessema Pillars of Organizational Transformation and Agility (TPOTA) and the Tessema Multiple Intelligence Framework (TMIF), demonstrating how leadership alignment, cultural adaptation, organizational learning, and multidimensional intelligence collectively shaped national reform. The analysis highlights that Saudi Arabia's approach differs markedly from the UAE's more gradual, federated transformation model, offering a unique opportunity to compare two effective yet divergent modernization pathways. The findings reveal that Saudi Arabia integrated structural reforms with human capability development and the expansion of its digital ecosystem, establishing a coherent institutional architecture grounded in Vision Realization Programs, centralized coordination mechanisms, and data-driven governance. Through TPOTA, the study evaluates how leadership, culture, learning systems, knowledge management, and intelligence development supported transformation. At the same time, TMIF illuminates the roles of intellectual, emotional, spiritual, cultural, and social intelligences in shaping adaptive governance. The intersection of the agile mindset and sustainability further demonstrates how national systems can balance rapid change with long-term institutional resilience. Comparative insights from the UAE show that while both countries achieved significant progress in economic diversification, digital governance, and social modernization, their strategies reflect distinct governance philosophies: Saudi Arabia’s centralized, fast-paced reforms versus the UAE’s incremental, innovation-driven evolution. Together, these cases expand theoretical understanding of national transformation and demonstrate how the Tessema frameworks can be applied to evaluate systemic change. This meta-analysis contributes to the literature on public-sector transformation by providing a comprehensive model for analyzing how governance structures, human capabilities, and cultural dynamics interact to produce sustainable national development. KEYWORDS: government transformation, organizational transformation, digital government, Saudi Arabia vision 2030, Tessema pillars, multiple intelligence framework, digital governance and institutional modernization, agile and sustainable governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!