Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Review . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Review . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Review . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AI as a Social Institution: Reconfiguring Power and Decision-Making in Human Governance

Authors: Mr. Pravin Singh; Mrs. Pinky Bajaj; Mr. Shubham Singh Chandel;

AI as a Social Institution: Reconfiguring Power and Decision-Making in Human Governance

Abstract

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is growing from a simple tool into a major social institution. It now shapes norms, decisions, and governance across many public and private sectors. AI works within social and technical systems that guide how people use these tools. It influences key areas like finance, education, healthcare, welfare services, and digital platforms. As organizations trust algorithmic results, AI gains authority in daily decision processes. It sets routines, classifies people, and defines normal or risky behaviour. This shift moves power from human judgment to automated and often unclear systems. Many of these systems are controlled by large companies and government bodies. These changes create ethical concerns about autonomy, fairness, bias, and legitimacy. Hidden bias in AI can repeat social inequalities in very harmful ways. Low transparency also weakens accountability and reduces public trust in important decisions. Cultural values shape how different communities judge algorithmic authority and its impact. In the future, AI will guide new forms of digital rights and citizenship. Human and machine systems will work together inside many institutions and services. Responsible AI needs clear rules, open processes, and strong public oversight. It also requires active community involvement in setting limits and expectations. Understanding AI as a social institution helps build fair and democratic futures.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green