
AimsThe objective of this study was to analyze immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a real-world data sample and examine the differences in incidence between affected organ systems, irAE severity, therapeutic agent, and gender. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies, anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors between January 2020 and May 2023 in a tertiary referral center in Switzerland. IrAEs documented in the electronic health records (EHR) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and analyzed descriptively. ResultsAmong the 500 patients, 196 (39.2%) were female. Treatments included pembrolizumab (51.2%), atezolizumab (20.2%), nivolumab (14.4%), durvalumab (6.4%), ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab (4.8%), cemiplimab (1.4%), avelumab (1.2%), and ipilimumab (0.4%). N = 216 (43.2%) patients had ≥ 1 irAEs (females: 47.4%; males: 40.5%). Severe (≥ grade 3) irAEs were reported in 13.6% of patients. The following irAE incidences were found: dermatological (15.2%), gastrointestinal (13.0%), endocrine (10.8%), musculoskeletal (4.8%), pulmonary (3.8%), systemic (3.6%), neurological (2.6%), cardiac (1.4%), renal (1.4%), hematological (0.6%), and ocular (0.2%). ConclusionNearly half of the patients experienced ≥ 1 irAEs, of which one-third severe. Females experienced more irAEs than males, above all due to a higher incidence of grade 1 irAEs. Only about half of the irAEs were reported as coded diagnosis. Further prospective studies on irAEs are warranted using structured documentation.
Dissertation vorgelegt von Lauris Annatha Mariam Auch.
UNILU Diss 2025 F5 EL
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
