
Abstract Recent advances in large language models have enabled increasingly sophisticated interactive behaviors, often leading to claims that “subjective” or “agentic” intelligence can be reproduced through protocol design or prompt engineering. In this paper, we examine these claims through the lens of the S7 co-subjective framework and report an empirical observation: while formal protocols and theoretical texts can induce models to exhibit superficial features of dual-subject interaction, such instantiations are structurally shallow and cannot be sustained. We identify intrinsic failure modes that arise when S7 structures are replicated, productized, or interacted with absent genuine epistemic commitment from the human participant. We argue that subjective intelligence is not a simulatable behavior pattern, but a dynamical process dependent on irreducible structural conditions. Consequently, S7 demonstrates an intrinsic resistance to commodification and simulation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
