Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods - Supporting Information

Authors: GIOVANNOZZI, ANDREA MARIO; Altmann, Korinna;

Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods - Supporting Information

Abstract

This file contains the Supporting Information associated with the publication “Interlaboratory comparison reveals state-of-the-art in microplastic detection and quantification methods”. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 16, 8719–8728 The document provides detailed supplementary material supporting the results of a large-scale interlaboratory comparison involving more than 50 laboratories worldwide. It includes extended methodological descriptions, statistical analyses, tables, and figures that complement the main manuscript. Specifically, the file reports: Detailed results of particle number and mass fraction measurements for polyethylene (PE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microplastics across different size classes; Comparative performance of analytical techniques, including µ-FTIR, µ-Raman, LDIR, SEM-based counting, and thermo-analytical methods; Statistical evaluation of inter- and intra-laboratory variability following ISO 5725-2; Identification of major sources of uncertainty in microplastic analysis; Recommendations for best practices in sample preparation, instrumental settings, calibration, particle counting, and data extrapolation. Although no standalone raw datasets are provided, this Supporting Information contains comprehensive tabulated data and aggregated results that underpin the conclusions of the associated publication. The material is intended to support transparency, reproducibility, and harmonisation efforts in microplastic detection and quantification methods. Funding acknowledgement “The project 21GRD07 PlasticTrace has received funding from the European Partnership on Metrology, co-financed from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme and by the Participating States.” Metadata information:• Funder name: European Partnership on Metrology• Funder ID: 10.13039/100019599• Grant number: 21GRD07 PlasticTrace

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average