Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessment of universal access to basic needs

Authors: Kikstra, Jarmo; Brutschin, Elina; Zaini, Tommaso; Riahi, Keywan;

Assessment of universal access to basic needs

Abstract

This report explores how ensuring Decent Living Standards (DLS) for all — covering essential services like nutrition, housing, transport, and health — affects global energy use and climate mitigation. We use the DESIRE model with bottom-up country-level information on energy requirements for DLS and integrate it with the MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM framework. We assess energy needs, gaps, and related emissions for ten global regions based on an assessment of 172 countries. In this report, we compare two scenarios to show initial results. A "Reference" SSP2-based mitigation pathway and a "Minimum Needs" (MN) scenario that starts from this Reference but additionally closes energy deprivation by 2040 while remaining within the same carbon budget of 520 GtCO2 between 2025 and 2100. Achieving DLS for all by 2040 increases global energy demand modestly (4% in 2030, 9% in 2040, 5% in 2050) but significantly increases in Sub-Saharan Africa (35% in 2030, 68% in 2040, 31% in 2050), the region with the highest DLS deprivation. Staying within the same emissions budget remains manageable through efficiency gains and clean energy transitions. Emissions associated with DLS provisioning are projected to drop in all regions due to cleaner - and eventually net-negative - energy systems. While the MN scenario leads to slightly higher short-term emissions in developing regions, these are offset by deeper reductions or carbon removal in wealthier regions. Coal phase-outs timing in developing regions is not delayed. This analysis illustrates a pathway of addressing global climate targets and human development simultaneously, when inequality and climate policy are designed together.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green