Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Digital sovereignty in an 'open manner'? EU tensions between autonomy and competitiveness

Authors: Celeste, Edoardo; Victor, Henriquez Diaz; Elio, Machado Neto;

Digital sovereignty in an 'open manner'? EU tensions between autonomy and competitiveness

Abstract

At the end of 2022, the EU solemnly adopted the Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles, a non-legally binding document systematising the Union’s shared political intentions and commitments towards the digital transformation. The Declaration stresses the importance of achieving a sufficient level of strategic autonomy in the digital field vis-a-vis foreign countries. This idea is expressed using the concept of ‘digital sovereignty in an open manner’, intended as a strategy to improve independence from non-EU players while fostering ‘the availability of services’ and ‘a dynamic, resource efficient, and fair economy’ (Recital 6). This chapter identifies a tension between these policy objectives. Is it possible for the EU to become digitally independent while maintaining its founding vision of an open and competitive economy? The chapter aims to assess this EU policy ambition by contextualising it in the existing regulatory framework and by carrying out a comparative analysis of similar policies emerging in the US and China. The chapter concludes proposing the adoption of a necessity and proportionality test to avoid protectionist distortions and to assess the alignment of EU digital sovereignty strategies with the protection of fundamental rights.

Related Organizations
Keywords

protectionism, competitiveness, open strategic autonomy, digital sovereignty

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Fields of Science
Fields of Science