
This working paper proposes a layered architectural framework for controlling, verifying, and contextualizing large language model outputs in high-stakes domains. Rather than introducing a new model or benchmark, the paper focuses on structural design principles for aligning model behavior with domain-specific constraints, verification requirements, and accountability mechanisms. The work is intended as a conceptual and governance-oriented contribution, suitable for discussion in AI governance, evaluation, and safety contexts.
safety architecture, persistent memory, narrative continuity, LLM evaluation, AI governance
safety architecture, persistent memory, narrative continuity, LLM evaluation, AI governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
