Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Guide to using DNA-based monitoring with citizen science

Authors: Cook, Lauren S. J.; Harper, Lynsey;

Guide to using DNA-based monitoring with citizen science

Abstract

Traditional biodiversity monitoring by professionals can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, and many habitats and species remain understudied and data deficient. Citizen Science (CS) and DNA-based monitoring are helping to fill these gaps by expanding the scale and impact of biodiversity monitoring. CS, or community science, involves members of the public in scientific research. It offers opportunities to build skills, improve wellbeing, and foster stronger connections with nature. DNA-based monitoring can detect species that are difficult to survey and help track how species distribution and ecosystem health and function change over time. This guide introduces CS and DNA-based monitoring, demonstrates how the two approaches can work together (CS x DNA), and provides practical advice on project design, volunteer involvement, training, and communication. The CS x DNA project, Genepools (Rees et al., 2023), is used to illustrate project design from start to finish, and we also explore future opportunities and challenges for this emerging approach. This document aims to facilitate crossover between these monitoring approaches and provides high-level advice for those wishing to use DNA-based methods in projects with volunteer involvement. We hope it will inspire collaborations between CS and DNA practitioners to drive better outcomes for people and nature.

Keywords

Citizen science methods, Citizen science, eDNA, environmental DNA, eDNA methods

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center