
ABSTRACT: In this study, components were 3D-printed using three different additive manufacturing technologies: Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), and Stereolithography (SLA). However, only the SLA printed parts were analyzed using non-contact measurement techniques. The dimensional accuracy of the SLA printed parts was evaluated using GOM Inspect software and the GOM ATOS non-contact 3D scanner, applying optical digitization to assess deviations from the nominal CAD model. This approach highlights the effectiveness of non-contact metrology in ensuring precision, especially for complex geometries and high-detail parts produced by SLA technology.
Additive Manufacturing, Dimensional Accuracy, Selective Laser Sintering, Stereolithography, 3D Scanning.
Additive Manufacturing, Dimensional Accuracy, Selective Laser Sintering, Stereolithography, 3D Scanning.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
