Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes Around Two Piece Delayed Loaded Implant in One Stage versus Two Stage Implant Surgery Procedure: A Clinico-Radiographic in Vivo Study

Authors: International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR);

A Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes Around Two Piece Delayed Loaded Implant in One Stage versus Two Stage Implant Surgery Procedure: A Clinico-Radiographic in Vivo Study

Abstract

Abstract Statement of problem: Various studies have been conducted to compare the soft-tissue changes between one-stage and two-stage implant surgery procedure but the relation of soft tissue and aesthetics with the type of surgical procedure is yet to be studied. Purpose of study: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the soft-tissue changes around one-stage versus two-stage implants both radiographically and clinically to assess the success of implants. Material and methods: Twenty edentulous sites for implant placement were selected from patients in the age range of 18- 51 years. They were randomly assigned to two equally sized groups respectively for one-stage and two-stage implant surgery procedure. After placement of implants, all the sites were evaluated for soft-tissue outcome using standardized indices. Patient satisfaction was analyzed using visual analog scale (VAS) and aesthetic outcome was observed by 3 blind observers. All the follow ups were done after implant placement (T0), at 3 months (T1) and 6 months after loading (T2). Any changes in soft tissue dimensions were also assessed on CBCT with the help of a prepared stent. Results: The collected experimental datasets were compared between one-stage and two-stage implant surgical procedures. Inter-group comparisons of One-stage Vs Two-stage implant surgical procedure among the variables showed a non-significant result. Patient Compliance scores and Aesthetic outcome by blind observers also showed non-significant differences. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that there were no significant differences with respect to soft-tissue outcome, patient compliance and aesthetic outcome

Keywords

Co-Morbidities, Implant Placement, Surgical Procedure, Tissues

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green