
ABSTRACT The quality of quicklime depends on its feed composition, microstructure, and calcination history. This review evaluates X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, and thermogravimetric analysis for assessing limestone and quicklime. We compare preparation, calibration, acquisition settings, and quantification, and explain how phases, textures, pore networks, and impurity loads govern burnability, sintering, and reactivity. A PRISMA-guided synthesis of 42 full-text studies identifies reliable indicators and common failure modes. We propose harmonised reporting, quality assurance measures, and decision rules that translate laboratory measurements into plant-ready specifications. Figures and Tables provide a conceptual framework, a PRISMA flow diagram, technique essentials, bias mitigation strategies, an evidence map, and a plant translation checklist.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
