Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Dataset for article "Measuring FAIR Data Compliance in German Energy Research"

Authors: Lu, Linna; Wein, Amanda; Werth, Oliver;

Dataset for article "Measuring FAIR Data Compliance in German Energy Research"

Abstract

This dataset was used as a data corpus for a comparative analysis titled “Measuring FAIR Data Compliance in German Energy Research: A Follow-Up Assessment to ‘Unveiling Openness in Energy Research’ Using OpenAlex, F-UJI, and FAIR-Checker “ The CSV file (2025-11-09_Dataset(1545)_OpenAlex(xpac)_Energy_Ger_2015-2025) was obtained on November 9, 2025 using the following query specifications: Field: Energy; Continent: Europe; Year: 2015-2025; Country: Germany; and Type: dataset. It was obtained from the OpenAlex database in the “Walden” version. This procedure resulted in a total of 1,545 datasets. Based on this file, a random sample of 384 dataset (Sample_Fuji_FC_results_384_doi - fuji_+FC_results_OA_year_repos.csv) was extracted for detailed evaluation. This dataset was collected, processed, and used to answer the following research questions: RQ1: To what extent are FAIR principles adopted in contemporary energy research datasets? - What is the average FAIR score of the datasets? - Which criteria of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) yield consistently higher or lower scores? Are there systematic gaps specific to the energy domain? RQ2: How do the FAIR scores differ between the results from FAIR-Checker and F-UJI, and what can we learn from them? RQ3: How do FAIR scores correlate with the characteristics of repositories, institutional affiliations, and open access status of datasets? - How does FAIRness differ between repositories/institutions? - What do the FAIR scores look like for the datasets from the top institutions in the preliminary study?

Keywords

FAIR data, Open Science, Energy Systems Research, FAIR-Checker, Research Data Management, F-UJI, Metadata Quality, NFDI4Energy, OpenAlex

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average