Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

COMPREHENSIVE REPORT: SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEM FOR MARTIAN COLONIZATION

Authors: Okushigue, Jefferson M.;

COMPREHENSIVE REPORT: SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEM FOR MARTIAN COLONIZATION

Abstract

ABSTRACT Current Mars life-support proposals assume biological closure without addressing the critical engineering challenge: absolute containment in a confined, high-consequence environment. This report presents the first Closed Artificial Ecosystem (CAE) architecture with integrated biosafety protocols, treating organism escape and system failure as design constraints rather than afterthoughts. Key Innovation: A 4-level containment hierarchy ranging from open cultivation chambers to triple-sealed negative-pressure bioreactors, enabling safe integration of high-risk/high-value organisms previously excluded from space agriculture proposals. Critical selections include Hermetia illucens (Black Soldier Fly) larvae for human waste bioconversion (eliminating 36 tonnes/year disposal problem), Tetragonisca angustula (stingless Jataí bees) for pollination in confined spaces, and tilapia-based aquaponics closing the nitrogen cycle without synthetic fertilizers. Quantitative Results: A 100-person pioneer colony achieves >95% nutritional self-sufficiency with 15,000-20,000 m² of intensive cultivation, requiring 1-2 MW continuous power input while maintaining >98% water recycling and >95% nutrient closure. The system includes explicit failure modes and mitigation strategies: insect escape probability (Low, catastrophic impact), genetic degeneration (High, medium impact), and psychological diet fatigue (High, medium impact) with corresponding engineering controls. Implementation Timeline: Conservative 10-year phased deployment from full Earth dependence (Years 0-2) through gradual biological integration (Years 2-5), expansion (Years 5-10), to operational self-sufficiency (Year 10+). Unlike optimistic 2-3 year projections in existing literature, this timeline reflects biological system stabilization requirements validated by terrestrial closed-environment projects (BIOS-3, Biosphere 2). Critical Exclusions: Comprehensive banned-organism list eliminates infesting insects (ants, termites, cockroaches), disease vectors, and any species requiring routine pesticide intervention—a selection criterion absent from competing proposals yet essential for long-term habitat integrity. This work provides implementable technical specifications, mass-energy flow diagrams, risk matrices with quantified probabilities, and organism-specific containment protocols. Complete system architecture addresses the engineering reality that Mars colonization depends not on growing food, but on growing food safely, reliably, and indefinitely in the solar system's most unforgiving environment. Keywords: Closed Artificial Ecosystem, Biosafety Containment, Black Soldier Fly Bioprocessing, Space Agriculture, Martian Life Support, Risk Mitigation, Hermetia illucens, Aquaponics, ISRU Biology

Keywords

Closed Ecosystem, Life Support, Space Agriculture, Martian Sustainability, Bioengineering, Biological Containment.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average