Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DNA Damage Induction After Exposure to Ferrite Nanoparticles for biomedical applications (MxFe3-xO4, M = Fe, Zn, Mn) in an Advanced 3D Human Hepatic in vitro Model

Authors: Rozman, Iza; Štern, Alja; Zegura, Bojana; Gallo-Cordova, Alvaro; Morales, Maria del Puerto; Hočevar, Domen; Goya, Gerardo;

DNA Damage Induction After Exposure to Ferrite Nanoparticles for biomedical applications (MxFe3-xO4, M = Fe, Zn, Mn) in an Advanced 3D Human Hepatic in vitro Model

Abstract

Nanosized spinel-type ferrites have gained recognition as a unique class of engineered nanomaterials with promising applications, but their safety profiles remain insufficiently explored. Although iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and manganese (Mn) are biologically relevant elements, the use of Zn- and Mn-containing ferrite nanoparticles in biomedical contexts demands careful (geno)toxicity evaluation. In this study, three ferrite nanoparticles – γFe2O3 (FeNPs), Zn0.7Fe2.3O4 (ZnNPs), and Mn0.4Fe2.6O4 (MnNPs) – synthesised through a microwave-assisted polyol route, functionalized with citric acid to improve colloidal stability, were evaluated for their potential (geno)toxic effects in an advanced in vitro 3D cell model, HepG2 spheroids. DNA damage induction was studied using the alkaline comet assay. After 24 and 96 hours of exposure, spheroids were dissociated into a single-cell suspension by collagenase treatment. Each spheroid was incubated in 0.25% trypsin–EDTA for 3 minutes and then gently dissociated into a single-cell suspension using cut pipette tips. After this the comet assay was conducted under conditions described in the Supplement material (Table 1). The cell suspension was combined with 1% low-melting-point (LMP) agarose and layered onto fully frosted slides pre-coated with 1% normal-melting-point (NMP) agarose. Slides were lysed, the nucleoids unwound and electrophoresis preformed, followed by neutralisation of the gells. Table 1: Comet assay conditions. Phase Buffer composition Conditions Cell lysis 0.1 M EDTA, 2.5 M NaOH, 0.01 M Tris, 1% Triton X-100 pH 10, 4 °C, 60 min Unwinding 300 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA pH 13, 4 °C, 20 min Electrophoresis 300 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA 25 V and 300 mA (0.5–1 V/cm), 4 °C, 20 min Neutralization 0.4 M Tris pH 7.5, 4 °C, 15 min For comet scoring, gells were stained using the GelRed nucleic acid stain (Biotium, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Analysis and scoring were performed using a fluorescent microscope and Comet Assay IV software (Instem, Philadelphia, USA). A positive (30 and 5 µM benzo[a]pyrene; BaP for 24 and 96 hours, respectively) control was included. Each experiment was conducted independently three times, analysing 50 nuclei per experimental point from a poled sample of 3-4 spheroids. The datasets represent the exported analysis performed in Comet Assay IV.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average