
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become integral to software architecture, the pre-vailing practice of ”Prompt Engineering” remains largely heuristic. This paper proposes ashift towards ”Context Engineering”, rigorously defining prompts as a set of constraintswithin a design optimization problem. By applying topological analysis to the model’s high-dimensional possibility space, we demonstrate that context acts as a dimensionality reduc-tion operator. We identify the phenomenon of ”Contextual Binding”—where excessive orconflicting constraints (both implicit and explicit) cause the feasible solution manifold to col-lapse into a null set, forcing the model into undefined behaviors often characterized as hallu-cinations. Furthermore, we validate this theory by analyzing empirical community heuristics(such as the ”KERNEL” pattern) alongside recent academic findings on in-context learningmechanics [?, ?]. Finally, we introduce ”Context Refactoring” as a methodology to manageconstraint density and maintain a healthy solution space.
LLM, Constraints, Topology
LLM, Constraints, Topology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
