
During the coming decades we will see a massive evolution of large, generic and „small, specific“ AI models for all kinds of purposes which will especially be true when we have solved the data sovereignty challenge, i.e. when data and model providers can be sure to get the credits for what they are offering. To a large extent these models will cover human knowledge and heritage requesting a completely different attitude to data as we are used to. Persistence and clear identification will be a requirement to exactly know which model is meant and how it was generated. Transparency is of great relevance to know where data came from and who processed them. Accountability of all actors involved will become a requirement, since humans will be increasingly dependent on the correctness of models. Proven and lean data infrastructures with certified processes willneed to guarantee accountabiility. FAIRness in the sense of machine actionability will remain important. FAIR Digital Objects will be the basic building block in these infrastructures and dataspaces that have a chance to improve sovereignty, transparency, accountability and persistence.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
