Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

From Artefacts to Algorithms: Federated Infrastructures, Knowledge Representation and AI in the Humanities

Authors: Schrade, Torsten;

From Artefacts to Algorithms: Federated Infrastructures, Knowledge Representation and AI in the Humanities

Abstract

The digital transformation blurs the boundaries between research activity and infrastructure in the humanities. Data‑driven methods and AI are gaining importance, yet their outputs hinge on the quality of underlying data and metadata. Initiatives such as the German National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) and the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) foster federated data spaces that enable large‑scale, cross‑modal data retrieval and analysis. Potential gains include accelerated discovery of cultural artefacts, reproducible workflows and new insights through federated data corpora. Risks appear in data fragmentation, algorithmic bias, dependence on evolving platforms, and the need for sustainable digital publication and development of new skills. Core competences of the humanities — close reading, archival work and hermeneutics — still remain essential. The Digital Humanities extend this repertoire with computational text processing and annotation, historical network analysis, computer vision, interactive visualisation and digital knowledge representation. This impulse talk examines how these new methods integrate into everyday scholarship and teaching in the humanities, supported through federated infrastructures such as NFDI4Culture. It closes by asking how digital methods can strengthen, rather than replace, humanities research while safeguarding data quality, data sovereignty and long‑term availability of data and results.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average