Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Report on policies relating to the use of LLM tools within higher education

Authors: Pastor Vargas, Rafael; Vilhelm, Monica; Tobarra- Abad, Ll; Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Angeles; Castrillo de Larreta-Azelain, Maria Dolores; Antonaci, Alessandra;

Report on policies relating to the use of LLM tools within higher education

Abstract

This report aims to provide a structural overview of the current landscape of the definition and application of specific policies on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter, GenAI) in Higher Education (hereinafter, HE), with an emphasis on governance. Various institutions establish policies governing the use/development/implementation of Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter, AI) at different levels, including local (such as universities), national, and international institutions (such as the European Union and UNESCO). To develop the report, traditional data sources (academic databases) and reference websites of institutions that develop global, national, and regional recommendations for AI governance policies, specifically in the field of HE, were used. The objective of this report is to map institutional policies and strategies related to the use of LLM in HE, identify key components, and develop guidelines for best practice and implementation. This way, key findings in the reports focus on key components of policies and best practices from actual deployed policies. Main findings are grouped and listed below: A) Key components for AI applied policies in HE institutions: • Legal and Ethical Requirements. • Acceptable Use and Detailed Guidelines. • Ethical Impact Declarations. • Training and AI Literacy Initiatives. • Critical Thinking Strategies. • Accountability and Enforcement Mechanisms. B) Best Practices in the deployment of AI Policies in HE institutions: • Legal and Ethical Practical Implementations. • Definitions of Acceptable Use and Clear Detailed Guidelines. • Assessment Redesign Proposals and Academic Integrity Rules. • Training and AI Literacy plans and certification. • Enforcement, Accountability, and Ethical Governance Practices.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green