
This paper addresses the connection between International Criminal Law (ICL) and Economic Criminal Law, discussing the theoretical frameworks of criminal liability of corporations and corporate agents for gross human rights violations. In addition, it discusses the cases brought against Lafarge and its subsidiaries and executives in the United States and France for conducting business with the Islamic State. It concludes that, while contemporary international courts generally do not have jurisdiction over legal persons, the special part of ICL provides a useful framework for addressing misconduct at the domestic level and warns economic actors of liability risks.
white-collar criminality, international criminal law, terrorism
white-collar criminality, international criminal law, terrorism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
