Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Performance evaluation of Online Tests vs. In-Person Final Exams in the Bachelors in Business Administration with Three concentration(Management, Finance & Marketing) at the University of Belize.

Authors: Dr. Romaldo Isaac Lewis (DBA);

Performance evaluation of Online Tests vs. In-Person Final Exams in the Bachelors in Business Administration with Three concentration(Management, Finance & Marketing) at the University of Belize.

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to evaluate the performance of Online Tests vs. In-Person Final Exams in the Bachelors in Business Administration with Three concentration(Management, Finance & Marketing) at the University of Belize. This study was based on online testing which represents a modern and efficient alternative to the traditional in-class final exam, especially in educational contexts that prioritize flexibility, equitable access, and the use of technological tools, although these advantages lead to unethical behavioral patterns. The specific objectives were to 1. Determine if there is statistical significance in the effects caused Score types (Average Online Test vs. In person Final Exams) and Three Concentrations (Management, Finance & Marketing) on the students’ performance. 2) Determine if there is statistical significance in the effects caused by the interaction between / among the Score types (Average Online Test vs. In person Final Exams) and Three Concentrations (Management, Finance & Marketing) on the students’ performance. 3) Determine the concentration that has the highest performance score during the two semesters (2023-1 & 2024-1) evaluated. From a concluding stand point we can say, that the Alternative Hypothesis 1 and 2 were accepted; considering that statistical significance was found between and among the factors; specifically, Score types; (Average Online Test vs. In person Final Exams) and the Concentrations (Management, Finance & Marketing). 2.There was statistical significance in the effects caused by the Score types (Average Online Test vs. Final Exams) and as well as the Concentrations (Management, Finance & Marketing) on the students’ performance score. Therefore, the Average online Tests score was superior than the in person Final Exam score. 3.There was statistical significance in the effects cause by the interaction of the Score types (Average Online Test vs. In person Final Exams) and the Concentrations (Management, Finance & Marketing) on the students’ performance score. Therefore, there is an interaction between that Finance and Management scores with regards to the students’ performance.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Online Test, Concentration, Management, Marketing, Finance, Factorial Analysis, ANOVA, Impact, In-person Final Exam, Average Test Score, Interactions, Tukey analysis.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green