
We present a conditional but comprehensive argument that P≠NP follows from physically and mathematically unavoidable properties of computation. The argument rests on the Intrinsic Operational Gradient Axiom, which we justify through converging principles from information theory, thermodynamics, category theory, and empirical observation. While the proof is formally conditional on accepting this axiom, we demonstrate that the axiom emerges naturally from fundamental asymmetries in counting, irreversible physical constraints on computation, and universal patterns across all known computational systems. The resulting framework suggests that the separation between P and NP reflects not algorithmic limitations but fundamental structural properties of operational reality itself.
FOS: Mathematics, Geometry, Mathematics
FOS: Mathematics, Geometry, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
