Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

THE FOUR BOTTLENECKS: Why Discovery Takes Centuries When We Have Years

Authors: Rivera Perez, Benjamin;

THE FOUR BOTTLENECKS: Why Discovery Takes Centuries When We Have Years

Abstract

Scientific discovery takes centuries when it could take months. The COVID vaccine took 326 days from genome to approval. Alzheimer's research has continued for more than a century with no cure. Same species, same century—different architecture. This position paper identifies four structural bottlenecks that systematically delay discovery: (1) the right minds appear by accident, (2) frontiers are found by accident, (3) institutions destroy agency before producing discovery, and (4) trust requires faith instead of verification. These bottlenecks form a four-layer stack—Agent, Frontier, Institution, Verification—that must align for compression to occur. When all layers aligned (mRNA), discovery took months. When none align (Alzheimer's), it takes generations. The paper proposes the Foundations Program: a research initiative developing operational frameworks for each layer, with falsifiable predictions and an invitation to pilot implementation. This is not philosophy of science. This is engineering. The question is not capability—it is architecture. And architecture is a choice.

Keywords

Science Policy, Research Methodology, Institutional Design, Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, Science of Science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Science and Innovation Policy Studies
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!